The baffling breakdown of the Australian T20I team

A lack of ruthlessness – what a thing to say about any Australian side – that might yet do for them at this T20 World Cup

Danyal Rasool04-Nov-20221:56

Moody: This performance a reflection of Australia’s campaign

“It’s just that New Zealand game.”That was Australian assistant coach Daniel Vettori’s taciturn response after his side’s four-run win over Afghanistan to a suggestion there might be wider issues for a side that now sits one game from elimination at the T20 World Cup.Australia’s humbling at New Zealand’s hands on the opening day of the Super 12 stage might have been surprising for the opposition it came against: New Zealand had not beaten Australia in Australia in any format since 2011, and found themselves comfortably outclassed when the two sides contested last year’s final. But New Zealand’s sensational 89-run win not only got Australia’s title defence to the worst possible start, it hobbled the hosts’ net run rate and has very likely cost them a semi-final place.Related

Australia's hometown exit: a campaign that started badly and never got going

This World Cup has belonged to the teams with the best bowling attacks

Report: Australia relying on SL after sneaking past Afghanistan

'Tactical decision' to leave Starc out says Vettori

Could Australia's battle against net run rate have been avoided?

While that evisceration might have been an exception, few have ever been convinced of Australia’s impregnability in this format, even on that run to the title in the UAE. Because T20 World Cups don’t necessarily throw up the best team as the winner so much as the side that manages to string enough knockout games together. In 2021, when an Australian unit that had, just four games ago, been thrashed by England with 50 balls to spare lifted their inaugural T20 World Cup title, it only seemed to underscore that point.A year isn’t a great deal of time between World Cups, but even so, this Australian side is strikingly similar to the one that won it all last November. Ten of the 11 who played against Ireland also started the World Cup final last year, and the 11th, Steven Smith, played today against Afghanistan. Whatever issues that side had has effectively carried over to this particular campaign, in completely different conditions. Also, it’s perhaps unsurprising a squad that already had the highest average age at last year’s World Cup began to see niggling injuries pile up; during that game against Ireland, three players went off the field nursing hamstring strains, and two of them would end up ruled out against Afghanistan.2:59

Moody: Much more to Starc’s exclusion than it being a tactical selection

Australia’s use of the resources they still had turned out to be a bit baffling too. All of which came to a head in a performance that, if not just as ordinary as that New Zealand showing, certainly finished a close second. Mitchell Starc has been struggling for form for the best part of three years, but having tied themselves in knots with how best to use him this tournament, they stumbled upon a novel solution: dropping him altogether. In a game Australia needed to win by – to use the technical term – lots and lots of runs, ditching perhaps the world’s best inswinging yorker bowler left everyone from Tom Moody to Michael Clarke to even Afghanistan coach Jonathan Trott completely nonplussed.In addition, no international team has a worse T20I average against left-arm pace this year than Afghanistan, scoring 16.2 runs per wicket. Left-arm pacers take an Afghan wicket every 13.7 balls, the second-best strike rate among all sides. They only concede runs at 7.1 runs per over; no side struggles to score as much against that kind of bowling. The replacement, Kane Richardson, might have a better overall death-overs record than Starc, but taken apart for 48 runs as he was, did little to justify the tactical epiphany Australia appeared to drop their most explosive pacer on.Having eschewed arguably the most aggressive bowling option, opting against promoting Glenn Maxwell further up the order in a bid for a bigger score appeared equally perplexing. Tim David came into this tournament as Australia’s X-factor, but hasn’t quite seen things go his way. There was perhaps little Australia could do but recall Smith to start, but sending him in after David Warner fell with the fielding restrictions still active continues to show Australia’s inability to buy into a philosophy of all-out, fearless attack. That he fell for four off as many deliveries perhaps meant little damage was done, but what happened next appeared to surprise the side’s most lethal power hitter as much as anyone attuned to watching modern, progressive T20 cricket.Glenn Maxwell was strangely held back in a game where Australia needed big runs•Associated Press”We lost the first wicket and I came out thinking I was five,” Maxwell would say post-match. “But I was told I was at six, so I said okay. I left my gear and I went back inside. There wasn’t a whole lot of conversation around it, I knew it was going to be a fluid batting order.”When Maxwell eventually did come in, he smashed an unbeaten 54 off 32, by far the highest strike rate of his team-mates. But for a man who looked in sensational touch at the nets the previous day, not to mention the high ceiling a Maxwell in form offers, being deprived of the chance to face even more deliveries to pile on the runs hinted at an impression of stifling inflexibility that has never quite escaped this Australian side.To boot, Maxwell would admit the knowledge of limited batting to follow played a part in how gung-ho he chose to be with shot selection, a problem alleviated either by a promotion or the total abandonment of any fear of getting out in pursuit of high-risk runs. On both counts Australia came up short in the way that England – who, in their own must-win game against New Zealand, dropped Dawid Malan to No. 8 and posted their highest score of the tournament – likely wouldn’t have.It is that lack of ruthlessness – what a thing to say about any Australian side – that might yet do for them at this T20 World Cup. While they were clinical in making up for run rate dents against Bangladesh and West Indies last year, they blew a golden opportunity to do the same in Brisbane against Ireland, allowing them to post 137 after reducing them to 25 for 5. Against Sri Lanka, they would find themselves bogged down in a chase they ended up achieving at a canter, the early tentativeness costing them once again.This certainly isn’t the worst Australian T20I side, even as they stare elimination in the face. They have lost just one match all tournament, and were deprived of the chance to determine their own destiny by the Melbourne rain. But as the curtain draws down on a home World Cup Australia are likely to take no further part in, the idea it was “just that New Zealand game” appears thinner than ever. This is a side that will likely be dismantled before the next T20 World Cup comes around, and on current evidence, it’s perhaps about time it was.

Stats – Joe Root's 50-plus average in Asia, and Lawrence matches his debut

The statistical highlights from a day that England dominated in Galle

S Rajesh15-Jan-2021168* – Joe Root’s score at the end of the second day in Galle. It is the highest by an England batsman in Sri Lanka, going past Kevin Pietersen’s 151 in Colombo in 2012. There are only three instances of an overseas captain scoring more runs in an innings in Sri Lanka: Stephen Fleming’s unbeaten knocks of 274 and 174, and Mushfiqur Rahim’s 200.ESPNcricinfo Ltd2 – Test hundreds for Root in Sri Lanka, making him the first England batsman to score more than one Test century in the country. Eleven England batsmen have a solitary hundred here.173 – The partnership between Root and Dan Lawrence, who made 73 on debut. It is England’s highest stand for any wicket in Sri Lanka, going past the Nasser Hussain-Graham Thorpe partnership of 167 for the third wicket in Kandy 20 years ago. It is also sixth-best for the fourth wicket by an overseas team in Sri Lanka.52.53 – Root’s average in Asia: he has scored 1366 runs in 15 Tests, with three hundreds. He is one of only three England batsmen to score more than 1000 runs at a 50-plus average in Asia; the other two are David Gower and Alastair Cook.ESPNcricinfo Ltd5 – Non-Asian batsmen who average more than 50 in Asia since 2010, with a 1000-run cut-off. Neither Steven Smith (1200 runs at 48) nor Kane Williamson (1545 runs at 46.81) are in this club.ESPNcricinfo Ltd73 – Lawrence’s score in his debut innings, which is exactly what Root scored on his Test debut in Nagpur eight years ago. In the last 69 years, only five England batsmen have made more runs when making their Test debut in Asia: Keaton Jennings (112 in Mumbai), Ben Foakes (107 in Galle), Cook (104* in Nagpur), Owais Shah (88 in Mumbai) and Haseeb Hameed (82 in Rajkot).

Mohammad Nawaz aced his last game against India. He's waiting for part two now

The Pakistan left-arm spinner and surprise-weapon batter looks back to his dream Asia Cup outing

Matt Roller22-Oct-2022″For two days, I had to switch my notifications off,” Mohammad Nawaz says, laughing, as he recounts the aftermath of a match that will forever be his own. Even if he never scores another run or takes another wicket in his Pakistan career, he will always have that night in Dubai in the Asia Cup.”It was a highlight of my career so far,” he says, speaking at Lahore’s Pearl Continental Hotel before travelling to Australia for the T20 World Cup via a tri-series in New Zealand. “The hype of the game is there all over the world, and when you perform against India, a lot of texts and notifications are going to come to your phone. I had to switch them off and just relax and sleep.”It was the sort of night every allrounder dreams of having. Nawaz’s first over, the fifth, cost eight runs and Suryakumar Yadav hit the first of his second for four over extra cover, but from that point, Nawaz conceded 17 runs in 18 balls and dismissed Suryakumar, arguably the world’s top in-form T20 batter, when he top-edged a sweep to deep backward square leg.Related

Shadab Khan is Pakistan's Mr T20, and it suits him fine

A clash of giants and a clash of philosophies, at the 100,000-seater MCG in a World Cup

Weather improves on match eve, but Rohit says India 'ready' for shortened game too

'This is how big players are made' – Nawaz (2017)

In T20 cricket, Mohammad Nawaz's case is a curious one

“He [Suryakumar] is the kind of player who plays everywhere,” Nawaz says. “If you’re a little bit off, he can punish you. When I was bowling to him – and at the other end was [Virat] Kohli as well – every ball, I was just thinking, ‘I have to be accurate. Let him play however he wants, but don’t give him any loose balls.'”Relentlessly hitting a good line and length, Nawaz finished with 1 for 25 from his overs as India set Pakistan a target of 182 to win. Having only batted 14 times in his previous 32 T20Is, he was not expecting to play a major role in the chase – at least, not until taps on the shoulder arrived from Saqlain Mushtaq and Babar Azam. “I was sitting there and then my coach and captain said I must pad up,” he says.”There was a right-left combination. When I went in, I was just very clear in my mind that we needed ten runs per over. I had worked in the nets. I was just thinking that I have to execute that and bring that hard work into the game. When left-handed batsmen are at the crease, it’s a little difficult for the opposition.”With Shadab Khan: “We grew up playing together and have really good chemistry,” Nawaz says about pairing up with him•AFP/Getty ImagesHe walked out at 63 for 2 in the ninth over, with 119 required off 68 balls, and had licence to go hard: he steered his second ball away for four off Yuzvendra Chahal, then swung his third for six over midwicket off Hardik Pandya. By the time he was out, slapping Bhuvneshwar Kumar to long-off, he had made 42 off 20 and set the game up for Pakistan to sneak home with a ball to spare.”It depends how you utilise the opportunity,” Nawaz says. “They were saving me for that, because I had to counter the legspin and use the boundary dimensions as well. One side was a little bit shorter. I had a clear mind. I knew that I had to play a cameo so my team could come out of a difficult situation.”Pakistan vs India, people follow this game all over the world and there is so much hype. As a player, to perform in this kind of game, your confidence grows. You learn a lot from big games because the pressure grows.”Nawaz has become an integral member of Pakistan’s T20 set-up since the last World Cup as a like-for-like replacement for Imad Wasim, another left-arm fingerspinner who could contribute with the bat and bowl in the powerplay. “He is a senior player and whenever we’re together, we try to pass on things: his arm ball is something that I ask him about,” Nawaz says.”I’m used to bowling in the powerplay. I used to in domestic games and in the PSL as well, for Quetta Gladiators. When I bowl with the new ball, if I am bowling the second over, I sometimes try to swing the ball but it depends on the conditions. Most of the time I just stay with trying to turn it.”Nawaz had to turn notifications on his phone off for two days after his heroics against India•Surjeet Yadav/AFP/Getty ImagesHe has formed a strong partnership with Shadab Khan, bowling in tandem in the middle overs. “For the past year, we’ve been working together really well. We grew up playing together and have really good chemistry. It’s been working for the team because we’ve been getting wickets in the middle overs and putting opponents on the back foot.”Nawaz has also been used increasingly often as a floater, batting in the middle overs to take down opposition spinners, as he did in Dubai. He batted at No. 4 with success in consecutive games at the end of the tri-series with Bangladesh and New Zealand, making unbeaten scores of 45 off 20 and 38 off 22 as Pakistan won their last group game and the final.He will have the chance to play India again on Sunday in front of a sold-out crowd at the MCG, if the weather plays nice. “As a team, we are very excited,” Nawaz says. “It’s going to be a big day again. We try to take it like a normal game and just work on whatever we need to. Everything else is not in your hands.”Our first sport is cricket and people die for cricket here. They support us a lot and expectations are high – very high. It is challenging, but as a player I enjoy it. When the whole nation is supporting you and behind you, if you perform well, it’s a good way to spread happiness on their faces. We always try to do that.”My message for the fans is: keep supporting us. Their support is very important for us, always. We’ve got a good bowling unit and some top-quality batsmen, so team morale is very high. Hopefully, we can put in some good performances and, , win the World Cup.”

England must go with Moeen Ali's flow in rare chance to capture casual fans

Under-used asset should be picked to perform for free-to-air TV outing

Matt Roller24-Jun-2021Whatever Eoin Morgan’s views on fiscal policy, it is safe to assume he places limited faith in the free market.When Moeen Ali’s name was called at February’s IPL auction, it sparked a bidding war between Punjab Kings and Chennai Super Kings, fetching him a fee of Rs. 7 crore (£690,000 approx.). It proved that while Moeen has been surplus to requirements for England’s T20I side for more than nine months, there is still high demand for his services in the biggest T20 tournament in the world, where competition for one of the limited number of overseas slots is fierce.And Moeen’s performances in the six games he played before the IPL’s curtailment vindicated Chennai’s faith in him. Batting at No. 3, he made 206 runs in six innings with a strike rate of 157.25 – only Prithvi Shaw and AB de Villiers made more runs at a quicker rate. With the ball, he bowled two overs a game on average, taking five wickets and conceding a miserly 6.16 runs an over.In an England shirt, by contrast, Moeen has not been required for nine consecutive T20Is and there is every chance that streak will extend to 10 games in Cardiff on Thursday evening (though Morgan has hinted there will be a handful of changes). He has played in just 12 of England’s last 37 T20Is and while he is certain to be named in the squad for the T20 World Cup this autumn, the fact he went unused during the five-match series in India in March was proof that he has been overtaken by Sam Curran as the luxury pick at No. 7, afforded by Ben Stokes’ presence in the top six. In all formats, Moeen has played only four times for England in nine months.England’s explanation for his ongoing omission is simply that conditions haven’t suited him. Pitches in Cape Town, Paarl and Ahmedabad offered very little turn throughout the winter and Cardiff, the venue for their thumping eight-wicket on Wednesday night, has such short straight boundaries that Morgan has always been reticent to use spinners there, particularly from the River Taff End. In Liam Livingstone – preferred to Moeen at No. 6 in the first T20I – he has a batter who can bowl both offspin and legspin in the same over, versatility which Moeen does not offer.But that rationale demonstrates the disconnect between how Moeen is viewed at club and international level as a T20 player: England see him as a second spinner who adds to their batting depth; Worcestershire, Chennai and Multan Sultans use him as a top-order batter who also offers an extra spin option when required. His offspin has been used increasingly sparingly in T20Is – he bowled a single over in each of his last six appearances and has been relatively expensive – but Morgan still refers to him publicly as their second spinner. For all England’s batting riches, it seems like a waste of his ability with the bat.ESPNcricinfo LtdThe elephant in the room is Dawid Malan’s form, which has dipped sharply since a superb innings of 99 not out against South Africa at the start of December. There is little doubt that Malan – still ranked the world’s No. 1 T20I batter by the ICC – would be a good option at No. 3 in a World Cup in Australia, where hard, bouncy pitches suit his strengths square of the wicket and off the back foot, but with the T20 World Cup due to be played either in India or on used pitches in the UAE, that has limited relevance.Malan struggled in India in March, being dismissed three times in 39 balls against spin, and with his runs drying up in domestic white-ball cricket, he is averaging 24.35 with a strike rate of 111.95 across all T20s since the start of the Big Bash. England’s unparalleled batting depth means that innings of 25 off 20 balls are significantly more damaging than early failures or flashy cameos, and Moeen – a quick starter, and a clean hitter of spin – looks like the ideal candidate to replace him if his lean patch continues.There is no guarantee he would have made a significant score, but it is hard to imagine Moeen nudging his way to 7 off 14 balls as Malan did on Wednesday night while England were cruising to victory. And if Morgan needs reminding about Moeen’s worth in Cardiff, he need only cast his mind back to his only T20I appearance there in 2015, when he hit 72 not out off 46 balls from No. 3 then dismissed Glenn Maxwell with the first ball he bowled.There is a wider context to consider, too. Thursday’s second T20I is one of two England men’s games shown live by the BBC on free-to-air TV in the UK this summer, and through no real fault of their own, the white-ball side has had limited opportunity to connect with the public at large since their World Cup final win.Related

  • Eoin Morgan defends rest-and-rotation policy ahead of T20Is against Sri Lanka

  • England's bowlers set up big win before Jos Buttler seals 1-0 series lead

  • England add element of intrigue to victory with use of Adil Rashid

The first T20I last night was their first game in front of a home crowd since that Lord’s final nearly two years ago, and with the vast majority of their careers stuck behind a paywall, their players will want to serve up a better spectacle than Wednesday night’s; even Jos Buttler and Jason Roy – perhaps the most destructive opening partnership in T20I cricket – could do little to liven things up with such a low target to chase. The fact that tonight’s match falls on the first rest day in the Euro 2020 schedule means the scope to draw in casual viewers is all the greater.There are two moves to make. The first is that if they win the toss, England should bat first regardless of the conditions on what is expected to be a used pitch. Not only would it give their batting line-up valuable experience of setting a total before this autumn’s World Cup, it would ensure there is a chance to show off their wealth of batting options.And the second is to pick Moeen, if not for Malan then for either Curran or Livingstone, whose brief spell on Wednesday proved that Cardiff does not have to be a graveyard for spinners. The demand for him in the IPL suggests he is wasted carrying drinks, and there are fewer better sights in the game than Moeen’s smooth flow while hitting down the ground – it would be a missed opportunity not to open it up to a significantly bigger audience than usual.

Shami comes off the sidelines to put on a show

He has played in just 14 of India’s 44 ODIs since the start of 2020 but remains crucial

Deivarayan Muthu21-Jan-20231:42

Shami on workload management: ‘I prefer playing matches’

The seam is bolt upright. Not even a hint of wobble. Finn Allen topples over like a house of cards. The ball clunks into the top of middle stump via a deflection off the back pad. Inducker after three outswingers. The perfect set-up. This is vintage Mohammed Shami. He strikes in the first over of the first-ever international game in Raipur to rouse a sellout crowd.Sure, there’s a smattering of grass on this pitch, though nothing as generous as a green seamer on the first day of a Test match in Hamilton. Shami keeps landing the ball on the seam to maximise the early juice. He keeps threatening both the edges. He doesn’t present width. He doesn’t offer the drive ball that New Zealand are searching for.Daryl Mitchell tries to manufacture that drive ball by shimming out of his crease, but Shami still beats him in length and has him weakly plopping a return catch. Mitchell throws his head back in despair. Shami throws the ball up in the air and wheels away in celebration.Replay – Ind vs NZ, 2nd men’s ODI

You can watch the replay of the second ODI between India and New Zealand on ESPN Player in the UK and on ESPN+ in the USA.

The drive ball never comes from Shami in the powerplay. Just one of his 24 in the powerplay was full, but even that wasn’t really hittable. Mohammed Siraj and Hardik Pandya back Shami up beautifully as New Zealand fall to 15 for 4 in ten overs. They are eventually rolled over for 108 in 34.3 overs.”Conditions were not as helpful to the bowlers as it may have appeared,” Shami said at the post-match press conference. “They got out early but conditions were not overtly bowler-friendly. We dismissed them cheaply by bowling a testing length. It was a damp wicket but it was important to keep good line and length. All the bowlers were disciplined and the result is for all to see.”New Zealand captain Tom Latham admitted that the unwavering accuracy of Shami and Siraj handcuffed their batters in the early exchanges.1:39

Jaffer: Shami unlucky in previous games, deserved his wickets today

“They obviously bowled fantastically well,” Latham said. “And like you said they were pretty relentless with the lines and lengths they bowled and that didn’t give us any easy scoring options and then obviously to be five down reasonably early on, I think just after the 10th or 11th over… Yeah, it was hard to come back from there. When you get bowled out for just over a 100 obviously makes things pretty difficult. So, unfortunately it was just one of those days where everything India did turned their way.”New Zealand briefly threatened a fightback through Michael Bracewell (who else?) once the ball grew older and softer. Shardul Thakur finally gave Bracewell the drive ball, and the batter drilled him down the ground for four. Then, when Shami returned to the attack, Bracewell carted him for three fours in six balls. Bracewell had laid into him in the first ODI in Hyderabad too but here Shami beasted the Beast. He ditched his attempted yorker, which disappeared to the boundary, for the big bouncer. He switched his angle from around the wicket to over the wicket and let rip a head-high lifter close to the off stump. Bracewell had very little time and room to work with and ended up top-edging it to the keeper. Game over for New Zealand.Prasidh Krishna or Umran Malik have been India’s chief enforcers in the middle overs of an ODI in the past two years. However, Prasidh is now on the sidelines, still working his way back from injury while Malik can’t find a place in this XI because India want some batting insurance at No. 8 in the form of Thakur. In their absence, Shami has stepped up with the old ball too and kept himself in India’s World Cup frame and Raipur couldn’t have been happier. The city had waited for a long time for its first international game and Shami ensured it was worth it, despite the match lasting just 55 overs. After the game ended early, a laser show kept the fans entertained. The show ended with a message to the crowd: “Chhattisgarh thanks you”. Perhaps, that was a message to Shami as well.India’s bowling depth is as unprecedented as their batting depth these days. Just like how Ishan Kishan made way for Shubman Gill immediately after smashing a double-century, Shami might have to make way for Jasprit Bumrah once he regains fitness. Which isn’t anything new. Shami hasn’t been an ODI regular for India – he has played in just 14 of their 44 games since the start of 2020. Siraj’s emergence has pushed him into the background a bit. But Saturday’s events proved he’s not the kind of player who goes quietly into the night.That means advantage India because how many teams can say they have a bowler like Shami as their plan B?

Manraj Johal's late-season emergence foreshadows joy of summers to come

Warwickshire debutant’s 3 for 29 offers reassurance amid autumnal gloom

Paul Edwards28-Sep-202112-6 looks more like an old-style price tag than a cricket score. Change the dash for a forward slash and knock off two bob and you have the label on the Mad Hatter’s topper. Such thoughts seemed only fitting on an unhinged morning at Lord’s, where Lancashire’s collapse to Warwickshire’s excellent new-ball bowlers looked something of a judgement on the decision to extend a five-day game into October. Those who called this match “a showpiece occasion” were stretching things a bit and those who referred to the Bob Willis Trophy should have consulted a dictionary.None of which is intended to criticise the late Bob Willis or the charities that will benefit as a result of this game taking place. It is merely to observe that the fixture seems something that has been tacked onto the end of a very long season.For many cricket lovers the curtain should have been brought down on Friday, when Warwickshire’s players piled on top of each other at Edgbaston after they had clinched the County Championship. Instead of which, we have an enormous encore which no one in the stalls has demanded. So as the number of wickets lurked menacingly just behind the number of runs one was grateful for Panzer’s, the St John’s Wood delicatessen whose almond croissants could even brighten any morning; even one on which the Jubilee Line had gone kaput because of signal failure at Baker St. I’d like to have seen Gerry Rafferty write a song about that.Related

  • Bob Willis Trophy: Crowning moment or anticlimax?

  • Has anyone had a longer career after their final Test than Rikki Clarke?

  • Warwickshire seal Championship glory as Somerset are overwhelmed

  • Vilas seals win to leave Lancs sweating on Edgbaston result

  • Essex's Varun Chopra retires from cricket

At which point Manraj Johal came on to bowl at the Pavilion End. Lancashire were already neck-deep in the Grimpen Mire when Will Rhodes threw the ball to his 19-year-old rookie but I doubt Johal cared too much that the scoreboard read 26 for 6. This was his first-class debut and it was taking place at Lord’s. Beat that with a stick.At first the nerves showed a little. They may even have been evident in the third over when Johal bowled a short ball only to see Josh Bohannon pull it straight to Dom Sibley at midwicket. Two overs later Tom Bailey was leg-before to one that nipped back and then Jack Blatherwick obligingly held his bat out and edged a catch to Sam Hain at second slip. When Lancashire were finally dismissed for 78 in 27.5 overs, Johal’s figures read 8-3-29-3.It is a lovely story for the last week of the season and one made all the richer when you know the circumstances behind it. Johal is 19 and opens the bowling for West Bromwich Dartmouth in the Birmingham League. He first played for a Warwickshire age-group side when he was 11; he has been a Bear since he was a cub.Five years ago, though, Johal was deselected from the county’s Emerging Player Programme (EPP), a decision he greeted with a courteous refusal to be dissuaded from his chosen profession. Last October, after a year in Warwickshire’s Academy and two further years on the EPP he signed his first professional contract.Manraj Johal celebrates his maiden first-class wicket•PA Photos/Getty Images”During his time in the pathway, Manraj has shown how determined he is to reach the top and he has also proved that he could overcome notable setbacks along the way,” Paul Greetham, Warwickshire’s high performance manager, said. “During lockdown he got stronger and fitter than ever by getting out running along the canals and by working on his skills by bowling to his dad in his garden.”He was deselected from the EPP but reacted by winning his place back the following year by having an excellent season in the county age groups and in the additional skill-set groups. Manraj has worked very hard to get to earn this rookie contract and it’s for him now to grasp this opportunity and to prove that he can make it in the professional game.”VVS Laxman used to give this advice to young cricketers; indeed, he probably still does. “Knock on the door. If you get no answer, knock louder. If there is still no answer, knock the door down.”To watch a young player make his debut in the last game of the season is one of cricket’s most encouraging sights. In its way it is rather moving for it offers reassurance that there will be another season, another spring. Manraj Johal will not give a fig that this game hardly stirs most people’s blood. It stirs his blood alright and for no other reason than that it is the next step on the way to the full realisation of his ambition.He has helped the Bears bowl out Lancashire for 78 and he has watched as his side’s opening batters make 120 without loss in reply. I might be risking things a shade here but I reckon Warwickshire have their noses in front.

Ishant vs Siraj and other selection questions for India

Will Virat Kohli pick four bowlers or five in South Africa, and what about the Rahane, Vihari, Iyer conundrum?

Karthik Krishnaswamy23-Dec-20212:32

India’s opening roulette since their 2018 tour of South Africa

Unless injury or illness intervene, India will have five certain starters on Boxing Day at Centurion – KL Rahul, Mayank Agarwal, Virat Kohli, Rishabh Pant and Jasprit Bumrah – and three near-certainties – Cheteshwar Pujara, R Ashwin and Mohammed Shami. Picking the rest of their XI, however, could be a difficult task. Here are three major questions that India will potentially ponder over in the lead-up to Boxing Day.Five bowlers or four?
India have played 15 Tests since Boxing Day last year, and each of the XIs have included five bowlers, with either Ravindra Jadeja or Washington Sundar slotting in as a batting-weighted allrounder in 13 of them. Neither is part of the squad in South Africa, which could make a five-bowler combination tricky to balance.Related

  • KL Rahul hints India may stick to five-bowler strategy for Boxing Day Test

  • Meet the quicks: South Africa's fast bowlers for the India series

  • From chaos to calm: How India have evolved since their last SA tour

  • What will new-look South Africa's starting XI look like?

  • Olivier on SA comeback: 'My nerves will be shot through the roof'

R Ashwin, however, has been a rejuvenated lower-order force this year. Having gone through a prolonged dip – he averaged only 16.72 from the start of 2017 to the end of 2020, with one fifty in 39 innings – he has lifted his batting back to a level near its best. He averages 28.08 in 2021, and apart from his century against England in Chennai, he’s made a few other useful contributions too. There was the unbeaten, 190-minute match-saving effort with a bad back in Sydney, of course, but also a series of valuable knocks against New Zealand – a 27-ball 22 in the World Test Championship final when Kyle Jamieson was running riot, and a pair of thirties full of crisp off-side strokes in Kanpur.India, therefore, could pick five bowlers if they feel Ashwin and Shardul Thakur – who has three fifties in four Tests – can provide enough with the bat at Nos. 7 and 8 to make up for the lack of batting ability among their Nos. 9, 10 and 11.

Rahane, Vihari and Iyer
The debate between Hanuma Vihari and Shreyas Iyer is covered in greater depth here, and both make strong cases for selection.Ajinkya Rahane, meanwhile, averages 19.57 in 12 Tests since scoring 112 and 27* in India’s victory at the MCG last year. He contributed a vital third-innings 61 to India’s win at Lord’s in August, but since then, six visits to the crease have brought him scores of 18, 10, 14, 0, 35 and 4.Rahane wasn’t going through anywhere near as lean a patch in the build-up to India’s tour of South Africa in 2017-18, but they still left him out in the first two Tests. If Kohli and the new coaching staff are inclined to make such a decision this time, India could play either Vihari or Iyer at No. 5, Rishabh Pant at No. 6, and five bowlers, or play both Vihari and Iyer at Nos. 5 and 6.

Ishant vs Siraj
New Zealand’s greater depth of pace resources was a key factor in their victory over India in the World Test Championship in Southampton. Having picked three quicks and two spinners in that game, India switched to a 4-1 combination for the rest of their tour of England, leaving Ashwin out of four successive Tests.If the conditions demand it, India have two routes to playing a 4-1 combination – they could pick Thakur and three other quicks, or simply pick four outright fast bowlers who offer very little with the bat. One other option, if conditions are heavily loaded in favour of seam, would be to pick four fast bowlers and no spinner.A 3-1 attack could also be on the cards, if India feel the need for the security of an extra batter.In all these cases, the competition for the fast-bowling slots will be fierce. Bumrah is an automatic pick, and Shami probably is too, and both will be raring to go after being rested for the home Tests against New Zealand.

Ishant Sharma, however, is an interesting case: he has world-class numbers since the start of 2018 – with 85 wickets at 21.37 in 26 Tests – but his numbers this year haven’t been too strong – 14 wickets in eight Tests at 32.71. His five wickets were key to India’s victory at Lord’s, but he looked completely off the boil in the next Test at Headingley, and less than threatening during the Kanpur Test against New Zealand. Two wicketless Tests cannot undo the work of a 311-wicket career, but India will probably keep a close eye on his rhythm in the nets leading up to December 26.There is, of course, a bigger reason for Ishant’s place potentially being under threat than his own rhythm or lack thereof. In the space of just 10 Tests, Mohammed Siraj has made a strong case to be part of India’s first-choice pace attack, and his three-wicket new-ball burst against New Zealand in Mumbai showcased everything that makes him so dangerous: slippery pace, a line that denies batters easy leaves, movement off the deck, and a sharp, accurate bouncer.Do India go with Ishant’s experience and ability to bowl dry, or Siraj’s all-out aggression?

IPL 2023: A relentless run-fest with no signs of slowdown

The season has seen unprecedented numbers, with the batters dominating through and through and the trend is likely to continue

S Rajesh10-May-2023Run-scoring quicker than ever beforeThe average run rate this season has been 8.95; the previous highest was 8.64 in IPL 2018. If we talk just about the first innings, the scoring rate has breached the nine runs per over mark for the first time in IPL history (9.07). The chase run rate of 8.83 is the highest too.

As many as six teams have scored at more than nine runs per over so far this season. Chennai Super Kings have gone at 9.43, Mumbai Indians at 9.41, while Royal Challengers Bangalore have scored at 9.09. In all the 15 IPL seasons before this, a team had exceeded the nine an over mark only six times.

The phase-wise numbers too point in the same direction. In the first innings, the powerplay run rate this year has been at an all-time high of 8.86; the previous best was 8.28 in 2018. Similarly, in the middle and death overs, the numbers so far in 2023 are better than those of the previous seasons.

The 200-run festsThe current edition of the IPL has already witnessed 12 more 200-plus totals than the previous best, and there are 20 matches still to go. There were 18 instances of 200 scores breached last year, which is well below the 30 recorded so far in 2023.

Five teams – Kolkata Knight Riders, CSK, Mumbai, Punjab Kings and Rajasthan Royals – have already breached the 200-mark four times each. Before IPL 2023, there were only five instances, in the entire IPL history, of a team scoring four 200-plus totals in a season: Kings XI Punjab (now Punjab Kings) in 2014, RCB in 2016, CSK in 2018, KKR in 2019 and CSK again in 2022. With 20 games still to be played, 2023 could be the first time a team posts five or more 200-plus totals in a season.The boundary boards getting pepperedIn the inaugural edition of the IPL in 2008, batters hit a six every 21 balls. That has now improved to one every 15.5 balls in 2023, again the best among all IPL seasons. In 2018, there was a six hit every 15.9 balls, which was marginally better than the 2022 rate of 16.2.

Among the 53 batters who have faced at least 100 balls this season, 31 have achieved a frequency of fewer than 15 balls per six. Glenn Maxwell leads that list with 27 sixes in 177 balls, which comes up to a six every 6.6 deliveries. Shivam Dube (7.7), Andre Russell (8.4), Heinrich Klaasen (8.9), Jitesh Sharma and Tim David (9.0 each) round off the top six. At the bottom of this list are David Warner – two sixes in 274 deliveries (137 balls per six) and Manish Pandey (one in 114 balls).The hit-menTwenty-one batters have faced 100-plus deliveries at a strike rate of 150 or more so far this season, which is easily the highest. Last year the number was 14. The presence of ten teams instead of eight means more opportunities for batters, but even so, the numbers this year are staggering. Before 2022, not one season had more than ten batters achieving this feat. Overall, there have only been 127 such instances in the IPL, which means this season alone has accounted for almost 17% of the total number.

Maxwell is on top of this list with a strike rate of 186.44, but what’s surprising is the presence of Ajinkya Rahane in fourth place (181.48).No signs of slowing downThere was an apprehension that the run rates would drop towards the second half of the tournament as the pitches got weary, but so far, at least, there have been no signs of any slowing down. In the last 26 games, the run rate has climbed to 9.04, compared to 8.87 in the first 28 matches. And a 200 total has been breached 18 times. The number in the first 28 games was 12.

Out of the 11 venues used so far, nine have seen run rates in excess of 8.6. The Ekana Stadium in Lucknow has been the outlier with a run rate of 7.1, more than one run lower than the next lowest. Among venues that have hosted at least three games, Delhi and Lucknow are the only ones that haven’t yet witnessed a 200-plus total.

The scoring rates might yet drop in the last leg of the tournament, but IPL 2023 has been an almost relentless run-fest. And there seems to be no sign of a slowdown.

IPL's soft signal on Dhoni is a chance put down

The game’s most high-profile league and its most successful player came up against each other. Here was a chance to set a fitting precedent; in the end the league blinked

Karthik Krishnaswamy13-Apr-20191:46

Dhoni was fired up by the way the no-ball decision was handled – Fleming

“He gave a no-ball! He gave a no-ball!”It’s an extraordinary sight. MS Dhoni, dismissed the previous ball, has marched back onto the field and is addressing these words to the square-leg umpire while pointing towards his bowler’s-end colleague.It happens every day at the base of cricket’s pyramid, in unruly contests officiated by umpires sourced from the batting team. It’s hard to think of an equivalent situation from a match this high-profile.It was a boundary-blurring act, quite literally. Within the boundary, the umpires’ word is law, but what happens when that boundary – which protects the closed system of the sporting contest and its rules – turns porous?ALSO READ: Dhoni’s on-field outburst ‘probably not’ right – Jos ButtlerFor a parallel, let’s turn to the greatest TV show of them all, , and to the Eastside versus Westside basketball game in season one, the moment when Avon Barksdale storms onto the court to harangue the referee when a decision goes against his team.”Yo ref, yo ref, yo ref… what the f***?” Barksdale screams in the referee’s face. “The boy was fouled, clear, straight up… how you going to not call that?”This isn’t just any coach of any basketball team. This is Avon Barksdale, kingpin of the West Baltimore drug trade.”Look,” the referee says, backing away from Barksdale, his face frozen in fear. “If you want I can put time back on the clock and replay it…”Cue outrage from Barksdale. “Are you talking about a do-over, baby? Are you talking about a f*****g do-over? That’s not how the game is played. You can’t do that!”Then he tells the referee how to do his job.”Man, you supposed to be the ref, right? Why don’t you stand up for your f****** self, you p***y! You can’t just let any ol’ m************ n**** get in your face… understand? Now walk away. Walk away.”It’s a terrific scene, capturing among other things the absurdity of sport’s arbitrary, inflexible rules and the indisputable authority figure of the referee existing within a universe of lawlessness and moral ambiguity. The entrance of a figure as powerful as Barksdale threatens the very existence of the referee, and of that basketball match as a meaningful contest.Dhoni isn’t Barksdale, but few wield the influence he does in Indian cricket, at a time when player power is rampant – take the last days of Anil Kumble as India’s coach, if you need an example – and when the BCCI is a considerably weakened force.For umpires Ulhas Gandhe and Bruce Oxenford, Dhoni crossing the boundary line and striding towards them, gesticulating aggressively, must have presented a far more intimidating sight than if it had been, say, Delhi Capitals captain Shreyas Iyer in his place. Umpires are human, and while this line is usually invoked while talking about the errors they occasionally make, players must also remember it in their dealings with them.Dhoni’s actions in Jaipur publicly undermined the umpires, as did Virat Kohli’s tirade after that contentious no-ball non-call in Royal Challengers Bangalore’s match against Mumbai Indians.Kohli got away unscathed, and Dhoni copped tge gentlest of penalties – 50% of his match fee, the minimum sanction for a Level 2 offence under the IPL’s code of conduct. It will hardly make a dent in Dhoni’s wallet, and it sets a precedent of utmost leniency.The game’s most high-profile league and its most successful player came up against each other. Here was a chance to set a fitting precedent; in the end the league blinked.

Why PSL 2022 is a reminder of the ECB's flimsy pullout from Pakistan tour

Four months after the board called off the visit to the country, a number of English players will now be part of the league

Matt Roller27-Jan-2022The Pakistan Super League is a finishing school for England’s best T20 cricketers. Since the league’s inception in 2016, England players have become increasingly popular to the extent that they now dominate the overseas player pool at the PSL, with nearly two-dozen due to appear in the 2022 edition which starts on Thursday.Ten of the playing XI for their first T20 international against West Indies on Saturday have PSL experience and the only exception, Adil Rashid, has expressed his desire to play in it in future. Eight members of the squad for that tour will fly from Barbados to Pakistan straight after this series to join up with their respective teams, and all six teams have English representation in their squads.A number of players have furthered their international cases through their involvement, including Phil Salt, Saqib Mahmood and Tymal Mills. “Playing for Peshawar Zalmi was a massive stepping stone for me to play for England,” Dawid Malan said back in 2019. “The pressure you get as an overseas player is like no other – it sets you up for when you get back to international cricket,” added Liam Livingstone.The involvement of leading overseas players in the PSL has been a contributing factor in bringing international cricket back to Pakistan on a regular basis. Chris Jordan and Malan both played in – and won – the 2017 final, the first PSL game staged in Pakistan rather than the UAE; five years later, 23 English players will travel to Karachi and Lahore with full confidence in security arrangements.Related

  • The uncapped England players eyeing a PSL launch pad

  • England withdraw from October tours to Pakistan

  • Ian Watmore stands down as ECB chairman

The 2022 edition clashes with several international series and the Bangladesh Premier League, but falls during a rare break in England’s schedule. There is a wide range of players involved: leading internationals, T20 circuit regulars, young players cutting their teeth and senior county pros looking for franchise experience. There are even two English coaches leading franchises in Peter Moores (Karachi Kings) and James Foster (Peshawar Zalmi).But if the English influx is mutually beneficial, it also serves as a reminder that only four months ago, the ECB decided to call off men’s and women’s tours to Pakistan on the flimsiest grounds imaginable through a statement laced with hypocrisy and innuendo.”We know there are increasing concerns about travelling to the region and believe that going ahead will add further pressure to a playing group who have already coped with a long period of operating in restricted Covid environments,” the statement said.The Team England Player Partnership later clarified that the players had not been consulted over the decision; Ramiz Raja, the PCB’s chairman, said that Pakistan felt as though they had been “used and binned”.Phil Salt will turn out for Lahore Qalandars in PSL 2022•PA Images/GettyThe statement also made reference to the T20 World Cup, casting doubt on whether “touring under these conditions” would represent “ideal preparation”, as though there was no choice but to send a first-choice, full-strength squad. In doing so, it ignored that the fixtures’ very purpose.The men’s series – which would have comprised two T20Is and been England’s first tour since 2005 – was effectively an acknowledgement of the sacrifice made in Pakistan’s tour to England in 2020, during which their players quarantined in a three-star hotel and spent seven weeks in a country where Covid-19 was spreading fast. As a result, the ECB could fulfill its commitments to broadcasters and avoid an even heavier financial hit than the one it suffered.Pakistan toured again in 2021 for three ODIs and three T20Is, and fulfilled the series even after England’s first-choice squad was ruled out of the 50-over leg after a Covid outbreak. If England had been overseas in similar circumstances, would they really have seen the tour through?Tom Harrison, the ECB’s chief executive, said at the time that England wanted to “play our part in ensuring the safe return of international cricket to this wonderful nation of passionate cricket fans” but by withdrawing in such vague circumstances, soon after New Zealand had pulled out of their own series, they immediately cast doubt on Australia’s upcoming tour – which, thankfully, looks set to go ahead.Perhaps this is water under the bridge. Ian Watmore resigned as the ECB’s chairman shortly after England’s withdrawal from the tours, and Harrison flew to Pakistan in November for discussions with Ramiz which concluded with an extension of England’s planned tour this winter from five T20Is to seven.But cricket’s insistence on postponing rather than cancelling fixtures means there is no guarantee that the reasons, which supposedly underpinned this winter’s withdrawal, will not apply in October. England’s leading white-ball players have almost no wiggle-room in their schedule, and next winter are also due to play bilateral series in Australia, South Africa and Bangladesh on top of a T20 World Cup: can the ECB guarantee they will all be available?The obvious solution would have been to go ahead with the men’s tour as scheduled and, in the event that players declared themselves unavailable due to their IPL commitments, a desire for family time ahead of a busy winter overseas or any other concerns, to find replacements accordingly.The contrast between English players’ clear desire to play in Pakistan and the ECB’s insistence that it could not fulfil a four-day, two-match tour should stick in the craw. The ill-judged, short-sighted decision to postpone is not one that will be forgotten quickly.

Game
Register
Service
Bonus